Earlier this Summer, the Arkansas Supreme Court affirmed the effectiveness of the 89th Amendment to the Arkansas Constitution, which was approved by Arkansas voters last November. For consumer credit, the amendment permits creditors other than federally insured depository institutions to charge interest on loans or contracts up to a maximum rate of 17% per annum.
Previously, the Arkansas Constitution only permitted interest at the lesser of (i) 17% per annum or (ii) 5% per annum in excess of the 90-day commercial paper rate announced by the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. Contracts charging a rate exceeding 17% per annum were void as to both principal and interest; contracts charging a rate exceeding the rate in clause (ii) above were void as to unpaid interest.
The Arkansas Constitution’s prior restrictions significantly restricted availability of credit to Arkansas consumers, and led to many lawsuits alleging usurious rates. With the exception of out-of-state national banks (which enjoyed the ability under federal law to export rates from their home states), many lenders and creditors ceased or significantly curtailed their consumer credit business in Arkansas. The enactment of the 89th Amendment and the Arkansas Supreme Court’s decision should have the combined effect of raising rates to market levels and increasing availability of consumer credit to Arkansas residents.
The amendment also conforms the Arkansas Constitution’s rate restrictions to the rate parity provisions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Financial Modernization Act of 1999, which permits federally insured depository institutions in Arkansas to charge interest at any rate which may be charged by an out-of-state bank’s branch bank located in Arkansas.
This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney.
This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary.
The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites.
In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.